Posts mit dem Label Pierre Molinier werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen
Posts mit dem Label Pierre Molinier werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen

Sonntag, 8. Februar 2026

SEXUAL AESTHETICS at Martin von Zomeren

 

Philipp Gufler: SEXUAL AESTHETICS



March 7 - April 25, 2026

Opening: Saturday, March 7, 2026, 5 - 7 p.m.

Saturday, April 18, 4 pm
Finissage with a conversation by Viktor Neumann and Philipp Gufler



In SEXUAL AESTHETICS, three bodies of work come together: quilts, mirror paintings, and the ceramic series Sexual Aesthetics, from which the exhibition takes its title. In Gufler’s work, research and material production exist in constant exchange. The way a work is made shapes how its story unfolds, while the historical narratives he engages with thread through his choice of material. Histories become tangible, something that can be cut, stitched, looked at, mirrored, shaped, and fired. His extensive experience with archives is reflected in the meticulous way he produces his work. Archives consist of partial records, inconsistencies, and silences, and the patience required to navigate them becomes visible in his artistic process – one shaped by the endurance of slow, sustained making, and an embrace of transparency and distortion. Like textiles or clay, history is assembled over time through acts of selection and emphasis. Rather than presenting history as fixed or complete, Gufler approaches it as something continuously formed and re-formed.

Mirror paintings

The mirror works, which Gufler describes as “performative paintings,” begin with pigment. Each colour is mixed with pigments by hand. Painted one by one, colour by colour, through silkscreen onto mirrored glass. The process unfolds slowly: screen positioned, squeegee pressed, as weight is shifted across the surface, the density of colour changes with bodily pressure – even a small change in angle can create visible textures in the pigment. When two colours overlap, a third tone forms at the intersection. Seen in the center panel, as the layers build, the amount of reflection lessens and the viewer’s own image of themselves becomes partially withheld. 

Gufler situates these works in dialogue with the history of Minimalism while “queering” its austerity by reintroducing the bodily presence and self-reflection. Some works adopt a triangular form, recalling the pink triangle once used to stigmatise queer people and later reclaimed as a symbol of resistance and collective memory. The mirrored boxes are a variation on his original works, containing the reflection ever so slightly more securely with enclosed structures.

Quilts

Gufler’s work does not approach history as a purely aesthetic reference. In the quilts, his engagement with the past takes on a more explicit form. Gufler approaches quilting as a ritual structure rooted in mourning and remembrance, each quilt is dedicated to a specific figure and grows out of sustained archival research, sometimes involving weeks spent studying personal estates and image collections. He carefully selects fabrics whose textures and colours resonate with particular aspects of their lives, often highlighting overlooked or marginalised elements of their stories.

“I always try to focus on people, either who are not in the focus or... I’m able to find a new angle.”

The compositions are deliberate and carefully constructed: photographs are mirrored, cropped, or subtly altered, and texts are embedded directly into the fabric.

Working with silkscreen, a medium he has developed over nearly two decades, he builds layered textile constellations in which personal desire, political struggle, and art history intersect. For example, in the quilt dedicated to Charlotte Wolff (1897– 1986), one of the early sexual scientists active in Berlin during the Weimar Republic, Gufler reworks a historical photograph by Man Ray by mirroring it and removing the second hand, so that she appears to read with her own hand rather than someone else’s. In close contact with the surrealist artists, Wolff later turned to palm reading after her medical licence was no longer recognised in exile, continuing her research on hands in a different form.

Ceramic works

While the quilts follow a structured internal logic, the ceramic works required a different attitude and tempo. They were developed during a three-month residency at EKWC (European Ceramic Work Centre), where Gufler extended his long-standing silkscreen practice into clay. Unlike conventional ceramic silkscreen methods, where images are printed onto already finished tiles and fired at lower temperatures, he printed with coloured clay directly onto wet, still-formable surfaces. After screen printing, he further processed the surface with stamps. His first bisque firings reached around 1200°C, after which he printed again with glaze followed by further firings at approximately 1040°C. Because many of the oxides and pigments may chemically react in extreme heat, the final result could never be fully predicted; prints sometimes shifted dramatically or reappeared as faint shadows. 

The moment of opening the kiln was the first time he would see the work, often confronting something entirely different from what he has imagined. He describes how this unpredictability initially frustrated him, before he learned to accept and embrace the loss of control. 

The ceramic works can be understood as traces of an unfolding process, tiles carrying the memory of their making, holding within their surfaces the artist’s method. Over time, he developed a rhythm within this delayed process, producing more than thirty tiles during the working period in what he described as an intense, almost obsessive cycle. The imagery embedded in the ceramics stems from extensive prior archival research; many of these images relate to the archive of Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science in Berlin, an institute that was destroyed in 1933, and whose image archive was partially displaced, sold, lost, and later spread in fragments across Europe. Some materials resurfaced only as reproductions in books, with limited documentation of their origins. Long-term references of Gufler such as Cosy Pièro and Karl Heinrich Ulrichs resurface and merge with images from the sexological picture atlases of Hirschfeld from prehistory, the Middle Ages, and up to their present day. The title refers to Sexual Aesthetics by Peter Gorsen, a book that examined how ideas about sexuality have shaped artistic production, and how those ideas are themselves influenced by the social and cultural values of their time.

Text: Mabel Woodley











Hazenstraat 20
1016 SP Amsterdam
contact@gmvz.com

Gallery opening hours
Wednesday - Saturday: 13:00–18:00

Sonntag, 23. August 2020

Autoerotismus

 



AUTOEROTISMUS

Exhibition: 9.9 – 11.10.2020
Opening: Tuesday, 8.9.2020, 5 – 9 PM



If one follows Lu Märten, a feminist writer and theorist, who started publishing articles on socialism, literature, land reform, women’s rights and art in 1902, it is the provision of art history to assemble an ever-expanding gallery of losses. It catalogues a history of forms lost for life. Philipp Gufler’s work, for all its ancestral halls, all its symbolic ovations and all its historical reference points, does no such thing. Ever. Rather, he reintroduces lives in art, isolating and intensifying pleasure points that did cross paths with art’s modern history but did withhold allegiance. For a very simple reason: “The complex body-fantasy is capable of much higher differentiation to the point of sophistry than positive art and humanities would have us believe to this day ... and not only the future of art and philosophy depends on whether we finally come down to it.”1 These are the words of Peter Gorsen, one of Gufler’s subjects, written in an essay on art he contributed to Armand Mergen’s “Sexualforschung. Stichwort und Bild”, published in Hamburg in 1962, with the support of Germany’s most influential sexual scientist, Hans Giese. The lexicon was a reworked version of the “Bilderlexikon der Erotik” that the Institute for Sexual Science in Vienna had brought out in ten volumes in the 1930s. One of its convictions had been to sideline the normalizing effects of psychoanalysis and counter them with a general pathology of pleasures. In distancing the field of sexuality from its (re)productive societal functions, and laying out a panorama of dysfunctionality in word and image, these two visual encyclopedias offered nothing less than an anthropological reorientation: the techniques, materials and appendages of a labor against reproduction. A labor of self-endangerment. A labor of desire. One could say that Philipp Gufler continues this work.

Gufler’s pieces in that sense are obituaries of living desires that stage a labor-history of pleasure. He invites subjects into it whose investment with artistic labor starts from what Giese calls “a partner-like relationship to oneself”2, at once a relation of alienation and communion. Gufler assembles these tipping points of metamorphosis of industrial illegibility. His mirroring metal sculptures, elementary forms, silkscreened with color palettes, perform an uncannily symbolic role within this scenario. They appear like blanks, windows, opened for pleasures yet unarticulated. Most of them seem to suggest a possible use value, future trays and mirrors of interiors populated by … us? An offer of consumption. Victor Vasarely, whose moldering museum in Aix-en-Provence served as the stage for Gufler’s film “The Responsive Body”, another one of Gufler’s subjects, offered just that in order to locate its excess within the beholder, “exceeding the optical adaptation limits" in which "the required vision becomes the sensation of pain"3. The pain of interrupted self-regeneration here is externalized into the public sphere. And it is pain in its changing forms which Gufler takes seriously as artistic form, exchanging narrations of tormented interiorities, with those of a “partner-like relationship to oneself” within a world of perversion. As Henri Nouveau, the person Giese addresses here without ever naming him, in one of his diary entries “after thirty years of permanent self-analysis and observation”, resumes: “it would be incorrect to call my life wrong, because it is based on irreal ideas; wrong was only that I was looking for reality, desired fulfillment.“4 The deadly hardship of feeling an unmodern life amidst modernity’s triumphal rage—Nouveau wrote this on January 13th 1945—finds itself in the tiniest corner, immersed in a labor of self-invigoration and -consumption. But these are the niches that Gufler opens up anew, that he turns into sequential halls, that he refuses to surrender to the reified exceptionalisms of art history. And here, Märten returns. Her major work “Wesen und Veränderung der Formen / Künste” of 1924 was dedicated studying to “the origin of forms — today called art — (and it) shows that there were no art conceptions and ideas in these beginnings. The forms originate from important life purposes; they are means to achieve them. Their primitive as well as their consummated type comes from a common source – labor.”5 The labor Gufler presents is that of “Autoerotismus”, a labor up for expansion, for communizations, for desires shared as forms of a life that does to offer a utopian outlook, but a “much higher differentiation to the point of sophistry”, a life of forms prepared to redirect its external relations, open to “register: what a spook the day brings…"6

Text by Kerstin Stakemeier


1 Peter Gorsen, Kunst (moderne, bildende) in: Armand Mergen (Hg.), Sexualforschung – Stich- Wort und Bild, Band I und II,Wien, Leipzig, 1963, S.447-516, hier S. 516 Institut für Sexualforschung Wien (Hg.), Bil- der-Lexikon der Erotik, Band I bis X, Wien/ Leipzig 1938. „Der Komplex Leib-Phantasie ist ungleich höherer Differenzierung bis zur Spitzfindigkeit fähig, als positive Kunst und Geisteswissenschaften es ihr bis heute zutrauen … und nicht nur die Zukunft der Kunst und Philosophie hängt davon ab, ob wir uns endlich zu ihr herablassen.“

2 Einführung von Hans Giese, zu Jürg Hansen, Abstraktion vom sinnlichen Erleben (Der Weg eines Malers), in: Hans Giese, Jürg Hansen, Wilfried Rasch (Hrsg.), Psychiatrische Beiträge zur modernen Kunst, Ferdinand Enke Verlag Stuttgart, 1967, S.15 „eine partnerhafte Beziehung zu sich selbst“

3 Peter Gorsen, »Transformierte Alltäglichkeit oder Transzendenz der Kunst«, in: Chris Bezzel, Peter Brückner, Gisela Dischner, Peter Gorsen, Alfred Krvoza, Gabriele Ricke, Alfred Sohn-Rethel u.a., Das Unvermögen der Realität. Beiträge zu einer anderen materialistischen Ästhetik, Berlin, 1974, S. 153, FN 25 “Überschreitung der optischen Adaptionsgrenzen” in der “das geforderte Sehen zur Schmerzempfindung” wird.

4 „es wäre unrichtig mein Leben falsch zu nennen, weil es auf irreellen Vorstellungen basiert; falsch war nur, daß ich Realität suchte, Erfüllung wünschte, Giese, Einführung, S. 21.

5 Lu Märten, Wesen und Veränderung der Formen/Künste. Resultate historisch materialistischer Untersuchungen, Frankfurt am Main, 1924, S.286. „Das Resultat der Untersuchung über die Entstehung der Formen – heute Kunst genannt, ergibt, daß es keine Kunstvorstellungen und Ideen in diesen Anfängen gab. Die Formen entstammen wichtigen Lebenszwecken; sie sind Mittel, diese zu erreichen. Ihre primitive wie vollendete Art entstammt der gemeinsamen Quelle – der Arbeit.“

6 Giese, Einführung, S.21. Beobachten: was für einen Spuk der Tag zuträgt



KEVIN SPACE
Volkertplatz 13
AT-1020 Vienna
















Photos: Maximilian Anelli-Monti